Mereja Forum

[Awash]

European Union promises to halt building Eritrean roads following criticism of “slave labour”

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 ERITREA HUB NEWS

Eritrean human rights organization withdraws claim against EU, but remains vigilant about forced labour

Source: Kennedy van der Laan

Amsterdam, 22 September – The Foundation Human Rights for Eritreans has decided to withdraw the lawsuit filed against the European Union (EU) over 80 million euros in aid provided to Eritrea. This decision was taken in response to the ‘no more roads’ approach announced by the EU, after repeated criticism of its financial support.

“We will continue our investigation into forced labour in Eritrea and will come back to this issue if new facts come to light.” States Muluberhan Temelso, Director of the Foundation.

Legal case

The lawsuit was filed on 13 May 2020 in relation to EU funding of a project in Eritrea which uses forced labour from the Eritrean national service. This is openly acknowledged by the EU. The situation is and remains contrary to the most fundamental norms of international and European law.

In response to criticism from the media, the European Parliament, and European member states, partly as a result of this lawsuit, the EU has indicated that it will change its policy with regard to road construction projects in Eritrea. The EU has announced a ‘no more roads’ approach, whereby further funds that were earmarked for road construction on top of the 80 million euros have been diverted to Sudan and other projects in Eritrea. The EU will also evaluate the ‘dual track approach’ of diplomatic relations with Eritrea, of which the road building project was a part.

The Foundation is largely pleased with these steps, says Emiel Jurjens, the Foundation’s lawyer. “The EU has recognized that supporting a project using forced labour is unacceptable. That is why the EU has now abandoned this policy by saying “no more roads”. The goal of the Foundation has thus been achieved. This is an important victory that means alot to the Foundation and to the Eritrean people”. However, this does not change the fact that the human rights situation in Eritrea remains of great concern.

Ongoing concerns

With these new developments, which are considered as unconditional and permanent by the Foundation, the core requirements of the lawsuit have been met. However, the Foundation will continue to closely monitor the situation and continue its investigation into aid in Eritrea implemented through use of forced labour.

The Foundation remains very concerned about the way aid is organized through the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF). From the beginning, the EU knew that forced labour would be used in the implementation of the road construction project, and the EU agreed with this. The EU argues that a national court could not review this case, but a collective claim cannot be reviewed by an EU court. “If this argument is followed, cases where the victims cannot be directly present, for example because they are still in repressive countries such as Eritrea, cannot be reviewed. This puts the EUTF in a legal vacuum,” states Jurjens.

“We remain seriously concerned about the road building project.” Says Temelso. “For example, the EU indicates that money will still end up in organizations under the control of the Eritrean regime, specifically the Red Sea Trading Corporation. It is not clear how the EU can adequately control this.”

https://eritreahub.org/european-union-p ... ave-labour

[( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)]

Please wait, video is loading...

Please wait, video is loading...

Please wait, video is loading...

[Awash]

European Union promises to halt building Eritrean roads following criticism of “slave labour”

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 ERITREA HUB NEWS

Eritrean human rights organization withdraws claim against EU, but remains vigilant about forced labour

Source: Kennedy van der Laan

Amsterdam, 22 September – The Foundation Human Rights for Eritreans has decided to withdraw the lawsuit filed against the European Union (EU) over 80 million euros in aid provided to Eritrea. This decision was taken in response to the ‘no more roads’ approach announced by the EU, after repeated criticism of its financial support.

“We will continue our investigation into forced labour in Eritrea and will come back to this issue if new facts come to light.” States Muluberhan Temelso, Director of the Foundation.

Legal case

The lawsuit was filed on 13 May 2020 in relation to EU funding of a project in Eritrea which uses forced labour from the Eritrean national service. This is openly acknowledged by the EU. The situation is and remains contrary to the most fundamental norms of international and European law.

In response to criticism from the media, the European Parliament, and European member states, partly as a result of this lawsuit, the EU has indicated that it will change its policy with regard to road construction projects in Eritrea. The EU has announced a ‘no more roads’ approach, whereby further funds that were earmarked for road construction on top of the 80 million euros have been diverted to Sudan and other projects in Eritrea. The EU will also evaluate the ‘dual track approach’ of diplomatic relations with Eritrea, of which the road building project was a part.

The Foundation is largely pleased with these steps, says Emiel Jurjens, the Foundation’s lawyer. “The EU has recognized that supporting a project using forced labour is unacceptable. That is why the EU has now abandoned this policy by saying “no more roads”. The goal of the Foundation has thus been achieved. This is an important victory that means alot to the Foundation and to the Eritrean people”. However, this does not change the fact that the human rights situation in Eritrea remains of great concern.

Ongoing concerns

With these new developments, which are considered as unconditional and permanent by the Foundation, the core requirements of the lawsuit have been met. However, the Foundation will continue to closely monitor the situation and continue its investigation into aid in Eritrea implemented through use of forced labour.

The Foundation remains very concerned about the way aid is organized through the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF). From the beginning, the EU knew that forced labour would be used in the implementation of the road construction project, and the EU agreed with this. The EU argues that a national court could not review this case, but a collective claim cannot be reviewed by an EU court. “If this argument is followed, cases where the victims cannot be directly present, for example because they are still in repressive countries such as Eritrea, cannot be reviewed. This puts the EUTF in a legal vacuum,” states Jurjens.

“We remain seriously concerned about the road building project.” Says Temelso. “For example, the EU indicates that money will still end up in organizations under the control of the Eritrean regime, specifically the Red Sea Trading Corporation. It is not clear how the EU can adequately control this.”

https://eritreahub.org/european-union-p ... ave-labour

[Awash]

ሕብረት ኣውሮጳ፡ 'ንኤርትራ ክህቦ ዝሓሰበ ልዕሊ 50 ሚልዮን ዩሮ ስሒብዎ'

23 መስከረም 2020, 19:54 EAT


]ኣብ ማእቶታዊ ስርሓት ዝተዋፈሩ ኣባላት ሃገራዊ ኣገልግሎት

ኣብ ሆላንድ ዝመደበሩ ትካል ሰባዊ መሰላት ንኤርትራውያን፡ ነቲ ኣንጻር ሕብረት ኣውሮጳ ከፊትዎ ዝጸንሐ ሕጋዊ ክሲ ከምዝሰሓቦ ኣፍሊጡ።

"እቲ ውሳነ፡ ሕብረት ኣውሮጳ ድሕሪ ተኸታታሊ ነቐፌታታት 'ብሕጂ ጽርግያ የለን' ['no more roads'] ዝብል መርገጺ ድሕሪ ምውሳዱ'ዩ ተወሲዱ" ክብል ጠበቓ ናይቲ ተሓላቒ ጉጅለ መሰላት፡ ከነዲ ቫን ደር ላን ኣብ ዘውጽኦ መግለጺ ጠቒሱ።

እቲ ጠበቓ ከምዝበሎ፡ ሕብረት ኣውሮጳ፡ ነቲ ብሕጂ ንተመሳሳሊ ዕላማ ክወሃብ ተሓሲቡ ዝነበረ ገንዘብ፡ ንካልእ ማዓላ ከምዝወሃብ ኣፍሊጡ ኢሉ። ...

https://www.bbc.com/tigrinya/news-54272 ... VmJ7a0bYVY

[sesame]

AgameWusha,

I am sure this video and others I will post will give you heart burn.

The 134 km AdiGuadad-Agordat highway is being constructed by a Chinese company using Eritrean expertise and labour. It has nothing to do with the EU.

Housing Construction is ongoing.

When the QeHawta suburb of Asmara is finished it will be bigger than Mekele

Beautiful villas in QeHawta

[Awash]

Please wait, video is loading...

[sesame]

AgameWusha,

You will not have anything like this in Agameland for 100 years

[Awash]

The one and only Eiraero.
Even Menghistu didn't think of anything close to this savagery

Please wait, video is loading...